Cases 1 - 10 of 14
PARRISH v. THE HUDSON SCHOOL et al
as 2:2025cv17986
Defendant:
THE HUDSON SCHOOL, REBEKAH SOLLITTO, EMILY FORD SYSTMA and others
Plaintiff:
TONY PARRISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Baliga v. Link Motion Inc.
as 23-827
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wayne Baliga, derivatively on behalf of Link Motion Inc., FKA NQ Mobile Inc.
Defendant:
Jia Lian, Xiao Yu, Link Motion Inc., FKA NQ Mobile Inc. and others
Appellee:
Robert W. Seiden, 469 Seventh Avenue New York, NY 10018 (212) 523-0686
Defendant / Appellant:
Vincent Wenyong Shi
Grandinetti et al v. Li
as 1:2019cv05731
Plaintiff:
Mario Grandinetti and Angela Grandinetti
Defendant:
Zemin Li, Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chen v. NQ Mobile et al
as 4:2018cv00096
Defendant:
NQ Mobile, Vincent Wenyong Shi, Roland Wu and others
Plaintiff:
Shiqiang Chen
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Zemin Zhao et al v. Ji Feng Huang
as 2:2017cv08521
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ling Chen and Zemin Zhao
Defendant:
Ji Feng Huang
Zemin Zhao et al v. Ji Feng Huang
as 2:2017mc00033
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ling Chen and Zemin Zhao
Defendant:
Ji Feng Huang
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv03225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Finocchiaro et al v. NQ Mobile, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv06385
Plaintiff:
Daniel Finocchiaro , Eric Mitchell , David Copeland and others
Defendant:
NQ Mobile, Inc., Henry Yu Lin, Omar Sharif Khan and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Zhao et al v. Huang
as 8:2015cv00288
Plaintiff:
Zhong Ling Chen and Zemin Zhao
Defendant:
Ji Feng Huang
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
