Cases 111 - 120 of 3,586
Jackson v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 1:2023cv16751
Plaintiff:
Justice Jackson
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Chavis v. T-Mobile US, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01513
Plaintiff:
Najah Chavis
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Williams v. T-Mobile
as 1:2023cv01508
Plaintiff:
Yolanda M Williams
Defendant:
T-Mobile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Robinson et al v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv05655
Plaintiff:
Julia M. Robinson and Kendall J. Hall
Defendant:
The United States of America, William J. Burns, Monica Bertagnolli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jaiyeola v. AT&T Inc., et al.
as 23-4027
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Dr. GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA, Ph.D., MBA
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T INC., T-MOBILE US, INC., VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv22926
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
Fiorillo v. NE Edge, LLC, et al
as 23-2014
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS J. FIORILLO
Plaintiff:
OCEAN DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC, GOTSPACE DATA PARTNERS LLC, GOT CAPITAL LLC and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NE EDGE, LLC, OSY TECHNOLOGIES SARL, APPLE INC. and others
Doe v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 4:2023cv05166
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc and Wireless Vision LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Aspen Networks, Inc. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Aspen Networks, Inc.
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 23-2047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
