Cases 51 - 60 of 3,586
Aror-ark O'diah v. John Roberts, et al
as 24-5074
Plaintiff:
Aror-ark Ark O'diah
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Chief Justice, United States Small Business Administration, also known as United States Small Business Administration, SBA, Isabella Casillas Guzman, SBA Administrator and others
Unruh et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01414
Plaintiff:
Ryan Unruh and Christopher Isbell
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC and AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ms. Jaami Ali v. AT & T, et al
as 24-1682
Plaintiff:
Ms. Jaami Ali
Defendant:
AT & T, T-Mobile USA, Inc., T-Mobile for Sprint and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Schanz et al v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00627
Plaintiff:
Ashley Schanz and Sebastian Schanz
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 151 Federal Communications Act
Hyperlync Technologies Inc v. T-Mobile USA Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Hyperlync Technologies, Inc. and Hyperlync Technologies Inc
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc., Does 1-10, inclusive, T-Mobile USA Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Humes v. T-Mobile Security John Doe
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Humes
Defendant:
T-Mobile Security John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HUNTER v. T-MOBILE
as 2:2024cv04128
Plaintiff:
JENEE HUNTER
Defendant:
T-MOBILE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Carby v. City of Spokane Washington et al
as 2:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Caryl Danita Carby
Defendant:
City of Spokane Washington, Barrack Hussein Obama, George Walker Bush, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
