Cases 31 - 40 of 1,184,153
Petty #283097 v. Horrocks et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Gregory Petty #283097
Defendant:
Rebecca Horrocks, Chester Dums, Lance Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ducksworth v. USA
as 2:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Jeffrey L. Ducksworth
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Terrell v. USA
as 2:2024cv00072
Petitioner:
Mark D. Terrell
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Cobbs v. Harrell et al
as 5:2024ct03106
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elroy Cobbs
Defendant:
Richard K. Harrell and Ricardo Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith-Egizio v. Rivello et al
as 1:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Tyler Smith-Egizio
Respondent:
Superintendent J. Rivello, Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and PA Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laubscher v. Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00768
Petitioner:
William Sean Laubscher
Respondent:
Warden of Clinton County Correctional Facility, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hinshaw v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Jason Dewight Hinshaw
Defendant:
Keri L. Moore, John Rivello, John Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Cooper et al
as 3:2024cv00208
Petitioner:
James K Taylor
Respondent:
Bryan K Antonelli, Chief Cooper and Roger D. Wilson Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pankey v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01102
Petitioner:
Jaycent Pankey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
