Cases 31 - 40 of 82
Browne et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04224
Plaintiff:
Harold Browne, Robert Cush, Dwayne Jones and others
Defendant:
City of New York, John and Jane Doe 1-10, Joebian Ortiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Carpenter et al v. Combe Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv00846
Plaintiff:
Derek Carpenter , Ray Massey , Robert Bassett and others
Defendant:
Combe Incorporated , Combe Products, Inc. , Combe Laboratories, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. USA
as 3:2016cv00584
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Warren Harold Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Brown v. Stephens
as 4:2016cv00804
Petitioner:
Harold Brown
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Actavis Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03048
Plaintiff:
Harold Brown
Defendant:
Actavis Inc., Actavis Pharma Inc., Actavis Laboratories UT, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zamora et al v. Southwest Glass and Glazing, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01041
Plaintiff:
Dennis Zamora , Henry Nez , Harold Brown and others
Defendant:
Southwest Glass and Glazing, Inc. , Anthony S. Baca , Carol J. McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Brown v. Ramos et al
as 1:2015cv08358
Plaintiff:
Harold Brown
Defendant:
Sheila Ramos, John Doe 2, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishay, et al v. Deuschle, et al
as 15-1563
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PRO SE PARTY BAHIG F. BISHAY, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as private attorney general and MARY T. COSTELLO, (Bishay)
Defendant - Appellee:
KURT DEUSCHLE, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., ALVIN SAUL NATHANSON and others
Defendant:
BELL ATLANTIC YELLOW PAGES COMPANY, INC.
Interested Party:
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
BROWN v. CATERPILLAR, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02687
Plaintiff:
BROWN and HAROLD BROWN
Defendant:
CATERPILLAR, INC, MCCORD CORPORATION, MACK TRUCKS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
