Prisoner Petitions Cases matching "Jim MacDonald"
Cases 31 - 40 of 42
Michael A. Judge v. City of Attleboro, et al
as 1:2010cv11088
Plaintiff: Michael A. Judge
Defendant: Attleboro, City of, Richard Pierce, Barry Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Judge v. Attleboro, MA, et al
as 10-1249
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL A. JUDGE
Defendant - Appellee: ATTLEBORO, MA, FW HOLDINGS, INC., RICHARD N. PIERCE and others
Lamont Carter v. Jim MacDonald
as 10-15189
Petitioner - Appellant: LAMONT CARTER
Respondent - Appellee: JIM MACDONALD, Wardem, Florence Correctional Center
Kenneth Jerome Stidham v. Jim MacDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2010cv00120
Respondent: Jim MacDonald
Petitioner: Kenneth Jerome Stidham
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv01595
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Swan Smith v. Jim MacDonald, et al
as 09-35675
Petitioner - Appellant: SWAN DELAVERGN SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: JIM MACDONALD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA and SAM LAW
Swan Smith v. Jim MacDonald, et al
as 09-35134
Petitioner - Appellant: SWAN DELAVERGN SMITH
Respondent - Appellee: JIM MACDONALD and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MONTANA
Smith v. Ferriter et al
as 9:2008cv00012
Petitioner: Swan Smith
Respondent: Mike Ferriter, Jim MacDonald and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Carter v. MacDonald We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2008cv02103
Petitioner: Lamont Carter
Respondent: Jim MacDonald
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Maier v. Maurinac et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2008cv00026
Plaintiff: Lloyd Scott Maier
Defendant: Marty Maurinac, Ross Swanson, Biggs and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?