Civil Rights Cases filed in Guam matching "S"
Cases 101 - 110 of 827,369
Mcintyre v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02587
Plaintiff: Carl Mcintyre
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moreno v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02588
Plaintiff: Ramon S. Moreno
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Moser v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02589
Plaintiff: Robert Allen Moser
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ryals v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02591
Plaintiff: Mary Ryals
Defendant: Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00879
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Disability Definition
Scott v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff: Gene Edward Scott, II
Defendant: United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mola #365547 v. Ramirez
as 3:2024cv08096
Plaintiff: John Mola
Defendant: Hecter Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madsen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff: Jerry Madsen
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Watson v. Philhours et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Owen Watson
Defendant: Randy Philhours and Mike Snell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADITXT, INC. v. NEW DAY DIAGNOSTICS, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv02988
Plaintiff: ADITXT, INC.
Defendant: NEW DAY DIAGNOSTICS, LLC and Navroze S Mehta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?