Cases 31 - 40 of 825,515
Ingale et al v. Burns
as 2:2024cv00659
Plaintiff:
Nitin Ingale, Manisha N Ingale, Prathamesh Ingale and others
Defendant:
Brian S Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Sprague Operating Resources, LLC v. M/T British Engineer et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Sprague Operating Resources, LLC
Defendant:
M/T British Engineer, WMC, LTD, Britannia Steam Ship Insurance Association Europe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Wilson v. Top 40 Express Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carla Wilson
Defendant:
Top 40 Express Inc. and Gregory Hale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. First Horizon Bank et al
as 2:2024cv00313
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
First Horizon Bank and Iberia Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. Cadence Bank
as 2:2024cv00311
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Cadence Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v Cathay Bank
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
Cathay Bank
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DigitalDoors, Inc. v. First National Bank of Omaha
as 2:2024cv00314
Plaintiff:
DigitalDoors, Inc.
Defendant:
First National Bank of Omaha
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Craghead v. EXACTECH, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00477
Plaintiff:
John Craghead
Defendant:
EXACTECH, INC. and EXACTECH U.S., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
