Cases 51 - 60 of 825,475
Freeman (PS) v. Epps et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant:
Elizabeth (I) Epps, Elizabeth Epps and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Mayes
as 3:2024cv00355
Plaintiff:
Billy Asher Wilson
Defendant:
Jacqueline Mayes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newcomb v. Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center et al
as 1:2024cv01298
Plaintiff:
Dyron S. Newcomb
Defendant:
Warden of Kent Co. Det. Center, John Doe I, John Doe II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Wilson et al
as 1:2024cv01098
Plaintiff:
David Bryan Brooks
Defendant:
Brad Wilson, Donna Hetherington, Jody Pickens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Buckley v. Henderson County et al
as 1:2024cv01099
Not Yet Classified:
Tasha Carver
Plaintiff:
Dameion Buckley
Defendant:
Henderson County and Zachary Jeans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. delivery.com, LLC
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
delivery.com, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Five Guys Properties, LLC
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Five Guys Properties, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Analytical Technologies, LLC v. Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Analytical Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Roark Capital, Inc. d/b/a Subway
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Brown v. Dorsett, et al
as 1:2024cv00738
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Brown
Defendant:
Captain Dorsett, Officer Jarmon and Garry Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
