Cases 11 - 20 of 3,444
Patel v. Alphabet Inc., et al.
as 24-2530
Plaintiff:
RAJ PATEL
Defendant:
ALPHABET INC., GOOGLE LLC, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, A Governmental Entity and others
Cumberland County Board of Education v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv02448
Plaintiff:
Cumberland County Board of Education
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Facebook Payments, Inc., Siculus Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bey v. Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Marquette Lumumba Mugabe Bey
Defendant:
Evergy Metro Inc, Missouri, Spire Energy, KC Water and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Google LLC v. Havas Media Group USA LLC
as 1:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Google LLC
Defendant:
Havas Media Group USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Woodruff, et al. v. Google LLC
as 24-2479
Petitioner:
KIMBERLEY WOODRUFF, MEAGHAN DELAHUNTY, MEGHAN CORNELIUS and others
Respondent:
GOOGLE LLC
US Patent No. 7,679,637 LLC v. Google LLC
as 24-1520
Plaintiff:
US PATENT NO. 7,679,637 LLC
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Phillip Haywood v. Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office et al
as 2:2024cv03127
Plaintiff:
Phillip Haywood
Defendant:
Tmobile US Company and or Corporate Office, Adobe Google Microsoft, SRO Housing Corporation DTLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Strong v. YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
as 1:2024cv11033
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
YouTube(GOOGLE LLC)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
TJTM Technologies, LLC v. Google LLC
as 3:2024cv01232
Plaintiff:
TJTM Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
