Cases 1 - 10 of 1,184,689
Bolling v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00468
Petitioner:
Desi Eugene Bolling
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adkins v. Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
as 8:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Alfonzo Damien Adkins
Respondent:
Warden, Avon Park Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cooper v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv01129
Petitioner:
Jamell M. Cooper
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McLemore v. Downey
as 2:2024cv02105
Petitioner:
Kwatez Shadee McLemore
Respondent:
Michael Downey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Attaway v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv02107
Plaintiff:
Micheal Attaway
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. Clayton County Jail
as 1:2024cv02051
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
Clayton County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Campbell v. CoreCivic
as 2:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans #078208 v. Thornhill-Garrison et al
as 2:2024cv01076
Plaintiff:
Ira Deland Evans
Defendant:
Julynne Thornhill-Garrison, Eve Kelemen and Unknown Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
McCullough v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Alvin McCullough
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
