Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 31 - 40 of 134,370
US v. Brendan Holt
as 24-6474
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: BRENDAN JAMAL HOLT
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner: Joseph Nofflett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Neuhoff v. Bayless
as 5:2024cv00052
Petitioner: Colecius Neuhoff
Respondent: M.J. Bayless
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner: Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent: United States of America
Interested Party: John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Ravenscroft v. Office of the Fredrick County Comissions et al
as 3:2024cv00346
Plaintiff: Gary Lee Ravenscroft, Jr
Defendant: Office of the Fredrick County Comissions, Office of the Attorney for the Commonwealth, Office of the Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. GRTC of Richmond Virginia
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Maurice Hawkins
Defendant: GRTC of Richmond Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00348
Plaintiff: Randy Anderson
Defendant: Correctional Staff at Rappahannock Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grant v. Deputy Angel Rodriguez et al
as 3:2024cv03021
Plaintiff: Herman Grant, Jr.
Defendant: Deputy Angel Rodriguez, Deputy Richard Sholtz and John Doe Deputies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Hines v. USA
as 3:2024cv00482
Petitioner: Warren Eugene Hines, Jr.
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Anderson v. USA
as 3:2024cv03054
Petitioner: Thurl Rakim Anderson
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?