Cases 91 - 100 of 810,675
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02213
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Martin v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dinh v. Campbell et al
as 3:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Quoc Dinh
Defendant:
Julie Campbell, Christopher D. Hunt, Jason K. Back and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Martin v. City of Louisville, Kentucky
as 3:2024cv00297
Plaintiff:
Peppy Martin
Defendant:
City of Louisville, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Williams et al v. Manning et al
as 2:2024cv01310
Plaintiff:
Zenny T Williams and LaTonya Y Williams
Defendant:
K Devore Manning, J Mykulak Manning, T Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Gaines v. Grand Lodge of Maryland et al
as 1:2024cv01456
Plaintiff:
Stephen A. Gaines
Defendant:
Grand Lodge of Maryland, Regent University and Anthony Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Watkins v. Chau, et al
as 1:2024cv11328
Plaintiff:
Ida Watkins
Defendant:
Stephanie Chau, Christopher Norris, Kevin Collins and others
Ritrovato v. Doe, et al.
as 1:2024cv11337
Plaintiff:
Pro se litigant Nicholas A Ritrovato, III
Defendant:
Jane Doe and U.S.C.A for the First Circuit Clerk's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
