Cases 141 - 150 of 140,566
Williams v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Marshall Luther Williams
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Rojeski et al v. Master Moving, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rojeski and Ashelyn Rojeski
Defendant:
Master Moving, Inc. and Batia Zelig
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Morris et al v. Jupiter Aluminum Corportaion et al
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Danika Paige Morris and Joshua Wayne Morris
Defendant:
Jupiter Aluminum Corportaion, George Reed and Michael Fair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
McGranahan v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGranahan
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., PrimeCare Medical, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Toler v. Truist Bank
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Toler
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Baisi v. Western Regional Jail
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gregory Baisi
Defendant:
Western Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foltz v. Weirton Medical Center, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00063
Plaintiff:
Matthew Foltz
Defendant:
Weirton Medical Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Jarrell v. Dyer
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jason C. Jarrell
Defendant:
Tom Dyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Swiger v. State of West Virginia
as 3:2024cv00037
Petitioner:
Aaron L. Swiger
Respondent:
State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
