Cases 41 - 50 of 42,249
ROGERS v. CHRISTOPHER
as 1:2024cv01265
Plaintiff:
BRIAN A. ROGERS
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER J. DONATELLI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Pitts v. DiPierro et al
as 1:2024cv11148
Plaintiff:
Simone Pitts
Defendant:
Girolamo DiPierro and GMB Property Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Riccio v. RB Health (US) LLC
as 1:2024cv03136
Plaintiff:
Rose Riccio
Defendant:
Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals Inc. and RB Health (US) LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Gudena et al v. Gudena et al
as 1:2024cv00722
Plaintiff:
Vinay Gudena and Lakshmi C. Namballa
Defendant:
Vivekananda Gudena, DAB INSPECTION AND CONSULTING SERVICES, LLC, BABU RAMARAJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Alia Al-Sabah v. World Business Lenders, LLC
as 24-1382
Plaintiff:
ALIA SALEM AL-SABAH
Defendant:
WORLD BUSINESS LENDERS, LLC, ROBERT WILLIAMS, UPTOWN COMMERICAL CAPITAL and others
Song v. AKA Thomas Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Maoying Song
Defendant:
Defendant 1 AKA Thomas Johnson and JOHN DOES 1- 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Schwarck v. Redditt et al
as 6:2024cv02021
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schwarck
Defendant:
John Redditt and JBRC, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Fraud
Wright v. Richardson, et al.
as 2:2024cv11121
Defendant:
Deshon Anderson, Cedric Lamar Richardson, Dawn Palmer and others
Plaintiff:
Bridgett Wright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Taylor et al v. EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Ralph Taylor and Lloyd Baker
Defendant:
EQT TGHL Exploration, LLC and Tug Hill Operating, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Strano et al
as 1:2024cv03195
Plaintiff:
Rene Strano and The Proctor & Gamble Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
