Cases 71 - 80 of 70,932
Duboise v. Piazza
as 2:2024cv10706
Plaintiff:
Donnie L. Duboise
Defendant:
Officer Piazza and Piazza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bunker et al v. Mackinac, County of et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bunker, Steven Hetzner, Estate of John Nelson Massaway, Sr. and others
Defendant:
Mackinac, County of, Jennifer Goudreau and Nora A. Massey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Other Civil Rights
Volynets v. Bradley County et al
as 1:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Roxana Volynets
Defendant:
Bradley County, City of Cleveland, Tennessee and Willie Espinoza, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00599
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0701 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00600
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10688
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Barfell v. Driveline Retail Merchandising et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Thomas H.L. Barfell
Defendant:
Driveline Retail Merchandising, Trion Solutions Inc., Heather Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ross v. Tipton County
as 2:2024cv02313
Plaintiff:
Shelby Ross
Defendant:
Tipton County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
