Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 61 - 70 of 248,546
McFarlane v. Fairway Trucking, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Kyle McFarlane
Defendant:
Fairway Trucking, LLC, Christopher Cleveland and Jerry Scott Ryan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Doe #1 MKC et al v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 (MKC) and John Doe #2 (JAS)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #066 v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
John Doe #066
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Grasty v. Pounds
as 3:2024cv00587
Petitioner:
Quinzell Grasty
Respondent:
Zack Pounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norman v. Davidson County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Tony L. Norman
Defendant:
Davidson County Sheriff's Office, C. Taylor and Jessica Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ConvergeOne, Inc. v. Waterfield Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00595
Plaintiff:
ConvergeOne, Inc.
Defendant:
Waterfield Technologies, Inc., Klaus Hillmann, Frank Bryant and others
Boyer v. Iowa State Patrol et al
as 4:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Christopher J. Boyer
Defendant:
Iowa State Patrol and Alex Dinkla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Wolff v. Rose
as 5:2024ct03108
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Wolff
Defendant:
Dallas Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Unnamed Defendant
as 5:2024ct03109
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E. Nicholson
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
