Cases 31 - 40 of 13,660
McCoy v. Darlington, City of
as 4:2024cv02942
Plaintiff:
Hailey McCoy
Defendant:
Darlington, City of
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Densmore v. Weekley Homes, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01295
Plaintiff:
Ryan Densmore
Defendant:
Weekley Homes, LLC a Texas corporation doing business as David Weekley Homes and Dustin Jewell
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Riley v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Riley
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company doing business as GEICO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Amburgy v. All Western Mortgage, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00866
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Amburgy
Defendant:
All Western Mortgage, Inc.
Click et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Brian Click, Harvey Ferran, Nicholas Ingrodi and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Wheeling v. City of Winchester
as 5:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Joseph Wheeling
Defendant:
City of Winchester
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612 Family and Medical Leave Act
Rhoda v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00809
Plaintiff:
Robertta Rhoda
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131 Americans with Disabilities
GIANNATTASIO v. AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05854
Plaintiff:
TARRA GIANNATTASIO
Defendant:
AMEDISYS HOLDING, LLC, JOHN DOES (1-5) and ABC CORP (6-10)
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Crisologo v. Nordstrom Card Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00623
Plaintiff:
Daniel Galvin Crisologo
Defendant:
Nordstrom Card Services Inc and Michael Bengs
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family & Medical Leave Act
Flores v. County of Hidalgo
as 7:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Flores
Defendant:
County of Hidalgo
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
