Cases 11 - 20 of 1,186,082
Watson v. Campos
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Tyson Nathaniel Watson
Defendant:
C.A. Campos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wingfield v. Phams
as 1:2024cv02221
Petitioner:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Respondent:
Angela Phams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Defendant:
Thomas Scott Clegg, Jeffrey Mann and Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiley v. Meracle et al
as 3:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Dannie Wiley
Defendant:
Seth Meracle, Johnnie Smith, Mac-Shane Frank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKHART v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL DOCTOR et al
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
RANDAL S. BURKHART
Defendant:
VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL DOCTOR, VANDERBURGH COUNTY JAIL NURSE PRACTIONER and KRISTINA PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Louisville Metro Detention Center et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Clifton Clinton Williams, IV
Defendant:
Louisville Metro Detention Center, Chief Jailer, Public Affairs and Human Resources Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rachal v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Rachal
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Timothy Hooper, James LeBlanc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinton v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00093
Petitioner:
Shannon Rochelle Hinton
Respondent:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
