Cases 11 - 20 of 880,080
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ford v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02904
Plaintiff:
Elson D Ford, Jr.
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ketchens v. Rewerts
as 2:2024cv11388
Petitioner:
Leonard Michael Ketchens
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Hooker v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Natalie Hooker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Iroku v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Matthew Iroku
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mosley et al v. Wells Fargo & Company et al
as 3:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Mosley, Amy Caster, Amy Hartley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr. v. Superior Court Antelope Valley et al
as 5:2024cv01105
Petitioner:
Anthony David Gonsalves, Jr.
Respondent:
Superior Court Antelope Valley and CDCR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowe et al v. Cathey et al
as 3:2024cv00507
Plaintiff:
Dominic A. Lowe, Eyan A. Moore and Pedro Marcelino
Defendant:
Eddie Cathey, J. Dennis, FNU Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
YAMAMOTO-CASTILLO v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JAMES YAMAMOTO-CASTILLO
Defendant:
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
