Featured Cases tagged 'law-firm'
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Grochocinski v. Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv05486
Plaintiff: David Grochocinski, David Grochocinski and David Grochocinski
Defendant: Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP, Mayer Brown Rowe & Maw LLP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
COZEN O'CONNOR, P.C. v. TOBITS et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv00045
Plaintiff: COZEN O'CONNOR, P.C.
Defendant: JENNIFER J. TOBITS, DAVID M. FARLEY and JOAN F. FARLEY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Gainor v. Sidley, Austin, Brow Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2006cv21748
Plaintiff: Mark J. Gainor, Mark J. Gainor, Elyse Gainor and others
Defendant: Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP, Sidley, Austin, Brown & Wood, LLP and others
Counter Claimant: Mark C. Klopfenstein
Counter Defendant: Mark J. Gainor and Elyse Gainor
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
Bergman et al v. Thelen LLP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv05322
Plaintiff: Adam Bergman, Adam Bergman, Kendrick Patterson and others
Defendant: Thelen LLP and Thelen, Reid, Brown, Raysman & Steiner LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Werth et al v. Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe LLP et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv04799
Plaintiff: Laura Werth, Laura Werth, Laura Werth and others
Defendant: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe LLP, Heller, Ehrman White & McAuliffe A Professional Corporation, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe (Washington), P.S. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Type: Labor Plaintiff
Plaintiff v. Defendant Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv00208
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Immunocept, LLC, et al v. Fulbright & Jaworski Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2005cv00334
Plaintiff: Immunocept, LLC, Immunocept, LLC, Immunocept, LLC and others
Defendant: Fulbright & Jaworski, Limited Legal Partnership, Fulbright & Jaworski, Limited Legal Partnership, Fulbright & Jaworski, Limited Legal Partnership and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Foley & Lardner, LLP v. Nathoo et al Featured Case
as 3:2007cv04572
Plaintiff: Foley & Lardner, LLP, Foley & Lardner, LLP and Foley & Lardner, LLP
Defendant: Salim Nathoo and Oral Health Clinical Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Paul Hastings Janofsky and Walker LLP v. Allison Lomas Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv05288
Plaintiff: Paul Hastings Janofsky and Walker LLP and Paul Hastings Janofsky and Walker LLP
Respondent: Allison Lomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mobile Billboards of America, inc., California Mobile Billboards, et. al. v. Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker, LLP. Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2007mc00037
Receiver: S. Gregory Hays
Plaintiff: Mobile Billboards of America, inc., California Mobile Billboards, et. al.
Defendant: Paul, Hastings, Janofsky and Walker, LLP.
Movant: Michael Lomas

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?