Cases 11 - 20 of 376,747
Grace v. Calvart et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
O'Shun R Grace and O
Defendant:
Jamie Calvart and Brian English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bixler v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Kagan Cole Bixler
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and David Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beraut v. Mazza et al
as 3:2024cv00352
Plaintiff:
Genesson Beraut
Defendant:
Kevin Mazza, Brian Owens, Lane Erwin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miranda Pizarro v. McDonald et al
as 1:2024cv11547
Plaintiff:
Johanns Miranda Pizarro
Defendant:
Sheriff Joseph D. McDonald, Jr. and Superintendent Antone Moniz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lay v. Wolthuis
as 1:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lay #449238
Defendant:
C. Wolthuis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Christopher et al
as 9:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Chalwain Green
Defendant:
Kim Christopher, Mitchell A. Young, Larry Nistler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILKINS v. DEGNER
as 1:2024cv06999
Plaintiff:
KHALIL WILKINS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DEGNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruggiero v. Rogers et al
as 9:2024cv00769
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ruggiero
Defendant:
Donald D. Rogers, Mark E. Carrow, Joseph H. Noeth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEIGHTS JR. v. NOBLE et al
as 2:2024cv03216
Petitioner:
ERIC A. SPEIGHTS JR.
Respondent:
ANDRIA NOBLE, JARED STRUBEL and EMILY ANSTAETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ROBISON v. WENGER et al
as 2:2024cv03217
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY C. ROBISON
Defendant:
BEAU D. WENGER, Scott A Smith, David C Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
