Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Xcentric Ventures LLC v. Borodkin et al
as 2:2011cv01426
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Lisa Jean Borodkin, Unknown Borodkin, Raymond Mobrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al., v. Richeson
as 2:2010cv01931
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures LLC
Defendant:
Shawn Richeson
Counter_claimant:
Shawn Richeson
Counter_defendant:
Xcentric Ventures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANTOINE et al v. XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01392
Plaintiff:
DR. MAX D. ANTOINE, MAX ANTOINE and AMERICAN CORPORATE SOCIETY
Defendant:
XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES and ED MAGEDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Arden
as 3:2010mc80058
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden
Xcentric Ventures, LLC, et al v. Sarah Bird, et al
as 10-15460
Plaintiff - Appellant:
XCENTRIC VENTURES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and EDWARD MAGEDSON, an unmarried man
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH L. BIRD, wife, UNKNOWN BIRD, Named as John Doe Bird - husband and SEOMOZ, INC., a Washington corporation, DBA SEOmoz.org
Asia Economic Institute et al v. Xcentric Ventures LLC et al
as 2:2010cv01360
Plaintiff:
Asia Economic Institute, Iliana Llaneras and Raymond Mobrez
Defendant:
Badbusinessbureau.com LLC, Does, Edward Magedson and others
Herman et al v. Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al
as 1:2010cv00398
Plaintiff:
Melissa A. Herman, David A. Russo, Herman & Russo, P.C. and others
Defendant:
Xcentric Ventures, LLC, Edward Magedson and John or Jane Doe
Xcentric Ventures LLC et al v. Stanley
as 3:2009mc00132
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures LLC and Ed Magedson
Defendant:
William "Bill" Stanley
Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Elizabeth Arden
as 2:2009mc00373
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Xcentric Ventures, LLC v. Arden
as 5:2009mc80309
Plaintiff:
Xcentric Ventures, LLC
Defendant:
Elizabeth Arden
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
