Tenth Circuit Cases

Cases filed
Cases 81 - 90 of 244,478
Roehling v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01223
Plaintiff: Justin R Roehling
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Arraz-Saenz (PS) v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2024cv01238
Petitioner: Horacio Arraz-Saenz
Respondent: United States Department of Justice, Immigration and Naturalization Services and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Vance et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company et al
as 5:2024cv00449
Plaintiff: Aaron Tyler Vance and Nicole Vance
Defendant: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, Ken Shelton Insurance Agency Inc and Blake Nightingale Insurance Agency Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Daly v. Cole
as 5:2024cv00445
Petitioner: Richard Daly
Respondent: D. C. Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman (PS) v. Epps et al
as 1:2024cv01215
Plaintiff: Michael S. Freeman, II
Defendant: Elizabeth (I) Epps, Elizabeth Epps and Philip J. Weiser
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gallegos (PS) v. Smith
as 1:2024cv01205
Plaintiff: Raul Gallegos
Defendant: Jordan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff: Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant: No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee v. Young
as 6:2024cv00155
Plaintiff: First National Bank and Trust Company of Okmulgee
Defendant: Patricia Boyle Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United States v. Barnes
as 24-3062
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: NADARIUS BARNES
United States v. Craig
as 24-3063
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: CHRISTOPHER CRAIG

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?