Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 100,041 - 100,050 of 231,329
Jones v. Quiring
as 3:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Rayon Jones
Defendant:
J. Quiring
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ainsworth v. Mazariegos et al
as 3:2024cv03053
Plaintiff:
Tyrell Devonte Ainsworth
Defendant:
Eduardo Mazariegos, J. Maturino and J. Defranco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elghembri v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Mohammad Elghembri
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe, Two and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kubica
as 2:2024cv04217
Petitioner:
Anton Michael Kubica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Olsen v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00173
Plaintiff:
Christopher William Olsen and Christopher W Seer
Defendant:
Washington State Department of Corrections, Leah Schumerth and Joy McDaniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2024at00410
Plaintiff:
Jasmyne M. Austin
Defendant:
R Rodriguez, V Ramolete, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Abdullah v. Phillips et al
as 1:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
B. Phillips, C. Critchlow, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03012
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
