Ninth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 100,051 - 100,060 of 231,139
(PC) Williams v. Kern State Prison et al
as 1:2024cv00556
Plaintiff:
Charmar Williams
Defendant:
Kern State Prison, CA Correctional Health Care Services, C. Pfeiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haywood v. Limon et al
as 3:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
Cameron L. Haywood
Defendant:
Efren Limon and Ogwurumba Casmir
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. CoreCivic
as 2:2024cv01073
Plaintiff:
Kevin Campbell
Defendant:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. U.S. District Court et al
as 6:2024cv00033
Petitioner:
Steven Gene Johnson
Respondent:
U.S. District Court and State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lee v. Borla
as 3:2024cv02811
Petitioner:
Webster Lee
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor v. Broomfield et al
as 3:2024cv02820
Plaintiff:
Tracy Taylor
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, J. Moeckly and C. Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pina v. United States
as 4:2024cv02783
Plaintiff:
Andrew Jonathan Pina
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgers v. Hill et al
as 3:2024cv00837
Petitioner:
Milton Melvin Rodgers
Respondent:
J. Hill and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
