Labor Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 134,296
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Lopez-Sanchez v. Ramirez Bautista
as 7:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Melchor Lopez-Sanchez
Defendant:
Fortino Ramirez Bautista
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Breslin v. The RDI Corporation
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Kambra Breslin
Defendant:
The RDI Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Hall v. Dolgencorp, LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Ashley Hall
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as DOLLAR GENERAL STORE #18921, Andrew King, Lisa Stone and others
Acting Secretary of Labor, United States Departmen v. Medi-Wheels of the Palm Beaches, Inc.
as 24-11553
Plaintiff:
ACTING SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Defendant:
MEDI-WHEELS OF THE PALM BEACHES, INC.
Cantu et al v. Thompson Michie Associates, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
Christina Kantu and Rebekah Svinning
Defendant:
Thompson Michie Associates, LLC and TM Equitites Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Lowe v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Bryson Lowe
Defendant:
Schlumberger Technology Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Pittman v. Ace in the Hole Towing & Transport, Inc., et al.,
as 2:2024cv01359
Plaintiff:
Marcella Pittman
Defendant:
Ace in the Hole Towing & Transport, Inc. and Russell Leon Cornett, Jr.
Como v. Mazel Pizza LLC et al
as 1:2024cv21847
Plaintiff:
Antony Como
Defendant:
Mazel Pizza LLC and Leonard L. Reiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
