US District Court for the District of Connecticut Civil Rights Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 211
Walcott v. Paramount Mortgage Group, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00143
Defendant:
Paramount Residential Mortgage Group, Inc. and Paramount Mortgage Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sonja Walcott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Backmon v. John D'Amelia & Associates LLC et al
as 3:2020cv00006
Defendant:
John D'Amelia & Associates LLC, Housing Authority of the City of Danbury, Pat Kelson Associates, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Carla Backmon and Carla R Backmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Commission On Human Rights and Opportunities v. 445 W. Putnam, LLC
as 3:2019cv01767
Defendant:
JTM Realty, LLC, Jeffrey T. Miller and 445 W. Putnam, LLC
Plaintiff:
Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Morton et al v. Griffin
as 3:2019cv01365
Defendant:
Arnitrice Griffin
Plaintiff:
Christopher Morton and Kelly Morton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Human Rights and Opportunities et al v. Portland et al
as 3:2019cv01178
Plaintiff:
Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities, ex rel. Cathy O'Keefe and Richard O'Keefe, Cathy O'Keefe, Richard O'Keefe and others
Defendant:
Town of Portland and Portland Zoning Board of Appeals
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Moure v. Vesta Corporation et al
as 3:2019cv00757
Plaintiff:
Yarieliz Moure
Defendant:
Vesta Windham, LLC, Ashley Johnson and Vesta Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King et al v. Mad Jo 3, LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00661
Plaintiff:
Evan Roberts and Rebecca King
Defendant:
Christopher Coyne, Mad Jo 3, LLC and Joann Manzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Williams v. South Park Inn Inc
as 3:2019cv00313
Plaintiff:
Zhakim Williams
Defendant:
Jeff Katz and South Park Inn Inc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
