North Carolina Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 30,415
Martin v. USA
as 3:2024cv00464
Petitioner:
Brandon Antoine Martin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
CARTLIDGE v. USA
as 1:2024cv00381
Petitioner:
JOSEPH MARSELL CARTLIDGE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
WRIGHT v. RANSOM et al
as 1:2024cv00382
Plaintiff:
KAYIE SHAUNE DEVORE WRIGHT
Defendant:
GENO RANSOM, FNU POTRELLA, FNU L. BULLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. USA
as 3:2024cv00451
Petitioner:
Dominic Xavier McDonald
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Messer v. USA
as 5:2024cv00114
Petitioner:
Lowell Thomas Messer, Jr
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
AZAR EL v. CABARRUS COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00362
Petitioner:
RASHAUD HUSSEIN AZAR EL doing business as JERIMY LOVE
Respondent:
CABARRUS COUNTY, CABARRUS COUNTY JAIL, MIKE DOWNS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ali v. Dexter et al
as 5:2024ct03103
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Janet M. Dexter, Hunter Fonvielle, Kayla Mercer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Noonsab v. State of N.C.
as 5:2024hc02090
Petitioner:
Somchai Noonsab
Respondent:
State of N.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hodge v. Cook
as 5:2024ct03104
Plaintiff:
Michael Joseph Hodge
Defendant:
Dr. Patrick Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HERNANDEZ v. STEIN et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
CARLOS HERNANDEZ and RA SAADI LENNOX HERNANDEZ EL
Respondent:
JOSHUA H. STEIN, JAMIE BULLARD and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF ADULT CORRECTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
