Labor Cases filed in Hawaii between January 1, 2004 and October 12, 2009 matching "merrill lynch"
Cases 171 - 180 of 2,754
Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC v. Dolar et al
as 1:2020cv03037
Defendant: Ryan Dolar and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
Plaintiff: Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv06448
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wang v. United States Oil Fund, LP et al
as 3:2020cv04596
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Virtu Financial BD LLC, Nomura Securities International Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Momo Wang
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Chowdhury v. PlayAGS, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01209
Plaintiff: Manjan Chowdhury
Defendant: David Lopez, Kimo Akiona, PlayAGS, Inc. and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Andrew Miller and Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System
Consolidated Defendant: Nomura Securities International, Inc., The Williams Capital Group, L.P., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and others
In Re: Libor-Based Financial
as 20-1987
Plaintiff: Lawrence W. Gardner, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, David Klusendorf, Axiom Investment Advisors Holdings L.P. and others
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Bank Dublin PLC, formerly known as Bear Stearns Bank PLC, Portigon/WestLB AG, Credit Suisse International and others
Defendant / Appellee: BBA Libor, Ltd., Credit Suisse Group AG, Lloyds Bank PLC, FKA Lloyds TSB Bank PLC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: The Berkshire Bank, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Government Development Bank for Puerto Rico
Hearn v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
as 5:2020cv00704
Respondent: Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.
Petitioner: Michael Christopher Hearn
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Loan
ABC v. DEF We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv04433
Defendant: WCFS Inc., Pinnacle West Corp., MFO Management Company (Towle Fund) and others
Plaintiff: ABC, Marc S. Kirschner and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Marc S. Kirschner v. Richard L. Dickson et al
as 1:2020cv04436
Defendant: Russell 2500 Index Fund, Master Small Cap Index Series of Quantitative Master Series LLC, Russell 2000 Index Non-Lendable Fund and others
Not Classified By Court: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated
Plaintiff: Marc S Kirschner
Interested Party: State Street Bank and Trust Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In Re: SSA Bonds Antitrust Lit
as 20-1759
Defendant: John Doe Defendants Nos. 1-100, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Incorporated, Barclays Services Limited and others
Plaintiff: Sheet Metal Workers Pension Plan of Northern California, Irving Firemen's Relief and Retirement Fund, City of Riviera Beach Police Officers' Pension Fund, on behalf of itself and all otrhers similarly situated and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation, Alaska Department of Revenue, Treasury Division and Iron Workers Pension Plan of Western Pennsylvania, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank, Deutsche Bank AG, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Atlas Uluslararasi Kumanyacilik tic A.S et al v. M/V ARICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00679
Defendant: M/V ARICA and FS Arica, Ltd.
Garnishee: The Master of the M/V ARICA
Plaintiff: Atlas Gemi Vanalari ve Ekipmanlari Tic Ltd Sti and Atlas Uluslararasi Kumanyacilik tic A.S
Intervenor Plaintiff: Deutsche Calpam GmbH, Network Shipping Ltd. and Bank of America Merrill Lynch International D.A.C.
Intervenor Defendant: Up To 249.999 Metric Tons of Fuel Oil and 174.998 Metric Tons of Marine Gasoil On Board the M/V ARICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?