Cases 121 - 130 of 215
UMAREX SPORTWAFFEN GMBH & CO KG et al v. TOYRIFFIC, LLC
as 2:2010cv04801
Plaintiff:
CARL WALTHER SPORTWAFFEN GMBH, GLOCK INC., HECKLER & KOCH, INC. and others
Defendant:
TOYRIFFIC, LLC
614) 629-3019 (fax:
April O Davis
United States of America v. One Ruger M77 Rifle et al
as 1:2010cv03019
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
One Ruger M77 Rifle, One Ruger 10/22 Carbine Rifle and One Heckler and Koch ST-9 rifle
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00729
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Heckler & Koch Inc v Precision Airsoft LLC
as 2:2010cv00078
Plaintiff:
Heckler & Koch Inc
Defendant:
Precision Airsoft LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. GAMO Outdoor USA, Inc.
as 2:2010mc00003
Plaintiff:
Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Defendant:
GAMO Outdoor USA, Inc.
Movant:
Umarex USA and Justin Biddle
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
WILLIAMS v. THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION et al
as 1:2010cv00019
Defendant:
THE STATE CORRECTIONS OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, JEFFREY BEARD, MARILYN BROOKS and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Leapers, Inc.
as 2:2010cv10337
Plaintiff:
Heckler & Koch, Inc. and Heckler & Koch, Inc.
Defendant:
Leapers, Inc. and Leapers, Inc.
Heckler & Koch v. Tippman Sports et al
as 2:2009cv01134
Plaintiff:
Heckler & Koch
Defendant:
Tippman Sports, Tigerstripe Paintball, Tigerstripe Paintball and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Heckler & Koch, Inc.. v. Johnson Yang
as 2:2009cv09136
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Heckler & Koch, Inc. v. Team S.D., Inc.
as 2:2009cv09131
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
