Cases 61 - 70 of 12,126
United States of America v. Hernandez et al
as 4:2024cv01853
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kristy Hernandez and Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Default of Promissory Note
Container Manufacturing Ltd v. VOBEV, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Container Manufacturing Ltd
Defendant:
VOBEV, LLC and ACF FINCO I LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Planview Delaware, LLC v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2024cv00521
Plaintiff:
Planview Delaware, LLC
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
McCurley v. Citigroup Global Markets Holdings, Inc., et al
as 24-1479
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW MCCURLEY
Defendant:
CITIGROUP GLOBAL MARKETS HOLDINGS, INC., CITIGROUP, INC., VELOCITY SHARES and others
Brady v. Truist Bank
as 4:2024cv03033
Defendant:
Truist Bank and BB&T Bank
Plaintiff:
James Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Lopez v. Palmer et al
as 5:2024cv11284
Plaintiff:
Sotero Lopez, III
Defendant:
Robert Palmer, Tiffani Palmer and Wayne County Clerk
TWO KNIGHTS DEFENSE, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
TWO KNIGHTS DEFENSE, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Davidson et al v. DaCruz et al
as 2:2024at00597
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Davidson and Radco Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Barry DaCruz, Mika Telecom Group, Inc. and Diversified Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Davidson et al v. DaCruz et al
as 2:2024cv01371
Plaintiff:
Robert A. Davidson and Radco Communications, LLC
Defendant:
Barry DaCruz, Mika Telecom Group, Inc. and Diversified Wireless, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Thompson v. Fidelity Investments
as 1:2024cv00185
Plaintiff:
Minister Deric M. Thompson
Defendant:
Fidelity Investments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
