Cases 81 - 90 of 417,984
Pittman v. Schaefer
as 3:2024cv00360
Petitioner:
Malcom Rashad Pittman
Respondent:
Office of George E. Schaefer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alan Wyman v. Christine Brannon-Dortch
as 24-1871
Petitioner:
ALAN WYMAN
Respondent:
CHRISTINE BRANNON-DORTCH, Warden
Marqus Patton v. Taggart Boyd, et al
as 24-2026
Plaintiff:
Marqus Patton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Warden of the Reception and Treatment Center, Michael Hilgers, Nebraska Attorney General and Rob Jeffreys, Director of the Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv02180
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Sgt. Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sechrist v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00503
Petitioner:
Tye A Sechrist
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Callioux v. Strange et al
as 2:2024cv00687
Petitioner:
Mr. Robert R.D. Callioux
Respondent:
Secretary Cheryl Strange and Superintendent Jason Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lerma #080531 v. Thornell
as 2:2024cv01148
Petitioner:
Alfredo Lerma
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Taylor v. District Attorney
as 2:2024cv01400
Petitioner:
Robert A. Taylor
Respondent:
District Attorney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Burnham (PS) v. State of Colorado et al
as 1:2024cv01397
Petitioner:
Arthur Burnham
Respondent:
State of Colorado and Attorney General for the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Culver, Dominique v. State of Florida
as 2:2024cv14157
Plaintiff:
Dominique Culver
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
