Cases 141 - 150 of 815,496
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Everard et al v. CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS et al
as 6:2024cv00342
Plaintiff:
James Everard, Anca Neagu, Michael Fornino and others
Defendant:
CITY OF KILLEEN, TEXAS, Debbie Nash-King, Nina Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01165
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Zeweldi v. DMV et al
as 3:2024cv00126
Plaintiff:
Filimon Asefaw Zeweldi
Defendant:
DMV, United Nation Help Care/Concern Refugee, NDSH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA)
Hillman v. Remain at Home Senior Care
as 1:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Lavaneicer Hillman
Defendant:
Remain at Home Senior Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Nieto v. City of Visalia et al
as 1:2024cv00741
Plaintiff:
Uriel Nieto
Defendant:
City of Visalia, Chief Jason Salazar, Antonio Matos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
