Cases 51 - 60 of 832,217
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03999
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jean-Rene v. Doe
as 3:2024cv01138
Plaintiff:
Markis Jean-Rene
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Tenesee Jr. v. Messerlli
as 3:2024cv01143
Petitioner:
Anthony Jordan Tenesee Jr.
Defendant:
K. Messerlli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv61161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Nunz v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv00288
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Nunz
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Johnson v. County of Imperial et al
as 3:2024cv01142
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
County of Imperial, City of Holtville, Justin Benavidez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Durham (PS) v. Ciolli
as 1:2024cv01848
Petitioner:
Jeffery S. Durham
Respondent:
A. Ciolli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
The City of Columbia v. 3M Company Inc et al
as 2:2024cv03794
Defendant:
Dodge Industrial Inc, EIDP Inc, Elevate Textiles Inc and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Columbia doing business as Columbia Water
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ORIENTAL AIR TRANSPORT SERVICE INC. v. TENKO PRODUCTS INC et al
as 1:2024cv04632
Plaintiff:
ORIENTAL AIR TRANSPORT SERVICE INC.
Defendant:
TENKO PRODUCTS INC and PINNACLE BRANDS, LLC.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
