Cases 161 - 170 of 5,745
PHANTOMALERT v. APPLE INC.
as 1:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
phantomALERT
Defendant:
APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Reddersen v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-2392
Plaintiff:
ATHENA REDDERSEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Gregory v. Spt. Municipal et al
as 1:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lamar Gregory
Defendant:
Spt. Municipal, Sheriff Chuck F. Wright, Major Leso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Collins et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2024cv01796
Plaintiff:
Deborah Collins, Hunter Collins, Henry Morales and others
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Doe v. Hyatt Hotels, Corp et al
as 1:2024cv02583
Defendant:
John Doe, Hyatt Hotels, Corp dba Hyatt Hotels and Resorts, Hyatt Corporations and others
Other:
Global Hyatt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Sizzling Black Rock Steak House Franchising, Inc. v. Black Rock Coral Springs, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv10380
Plaintiff:
Sizzling Black Rock Steak House Franchising, Inc.
Defendant:
Black Rock Coral Springs, LLC, 7th Bite of the Apple, LLC, Franchise Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1676
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and APPLE INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Smart Mobile Technologies LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
as 24-1675
Appellant:
SMART MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. and APPLE INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
