Cases filed in Kansas matching "S"
Cases 101 - 110 of 829,112
AlmondNet, Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC v. Oracle Corporation
as 6:2024cv00303
Plaintiff: AlmondNet, Inc. and Intent IQ, LLC
Defendant: Oracle Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Floyd v. Smith et al
as 7:2024cv00356
Plaintiff: Curtis Leroy Floyd
Defendant: Happy Smith, Rick White, P. Sykes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hulbert v. VADOC Publication Review Committee
as 7:2024cv00358
Plaintiff: Kyle Allen Hulbert
Defendant: VADOC Publication Review Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams Mathurin v. Orange County School Board- Rock Springs Elementary
as 6:2024cv01021
Plaintiff: Donna E. Williams Mathurin
Defendant: Orange County School Board- Rock Springs Elementary
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02124
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ridley v. Vanihel et al
as 3:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Daren Earl Ridley and Daren E Ridley
Defendant: Frank Vanihel, K Gilmore, John or Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Plaintiff: Benjamin Cano
Defendant: S. Salmonson, Figueroa-Price and Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lab Technology LLC v. Anritsu Corporation
as 2:2024cv00411
Plaintiff: Lab Technology LLC
Defendant: Anritsu Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?