Cases 71 - 80 of 830,720
Smith v. Joseph
as 6:2024cv01115
Plaintiff:
Herman Lee Smith
Defendant:
Officer Jean Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RuzsaA v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2024cv01114
Plaintiff:
Istvan Ruzsa
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
ASD Specialty Healthcare, LLC v. Trinity Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02632
Plaintiff:
ASD Specialty Healthcare, LLC doing business as Besse Medical
Defendant:
Trinity Dialysis Clinic, Inc. doing business as Trinity Dialysis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HIPPS v. MILLER et al
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ROBERT HIPPS
Defendant:
LUCAS MILLER, SWAIN and LAFAR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. O'MALLEY
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
MISTY S. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Boles #156632 v. Sisco et al
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Boles #156632, Jr.
Defendant:
Savannah P. Sisco, Kevin S. Dirschell and Bryan Morrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cartwright v. Watwood
as 3:2024cv00737
Petitioner:
Anthony Cartwright
Respondent:
Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. USA
as 3:2024cv00447
Petitioner:
John L. Brooks
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McCord v. USA
as 3:2024cv00448
Petitioner:
Lamont E. McCord
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
United Radio Incorporated v. SMART POS INC.
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
United Radio Incorporated doing business as Bluestar
Defendant:
SMART POS INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
