Motions to Vacate Sentence Cases filed in Washington matching "S"
Cases 41 - 50 of 829,633
Keller v. Perotti et al
as 3:2024cv05041
Plaintiff: Lucky B Keller
Defendant: Daniel S Perotti and Pennymac Loan Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Clark v. Reda et al
as 3:2024cv00707
Plaintiff: Lauren Clark
Defendant: Rick Reda and Reda Home Builders, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Biswas v. Kobylanski et al
as 3:2024cv01015
Plaintiff: Ashudev Biswas
Defendant: Christopher Michael Kobylanski and Michael Kobylanski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
(PC) Haag v. Macomber et al
as 2:2024cv01624
Plaintiff: James Bradley Haag
Defendant: Jeff Macomber, Ron Broomfield, Joseph Poick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDaniel v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
as 1:2024cv00981
Plaintiff: Lucas McDaniel
Defendant: CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01648
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SANDERS v. ALLEN
as 1:2024cv00987
Petitioner: DAMIEN B. SANDERS
Respondent: T. ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Miller v. Kings County et al
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff: Jeorgio Miller
Defendant: Kings County, S. Castrejon and C. Rajski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
iBeauty Brands, Inc. v. Bondi Boost US, LLC
as 1:2024cv00684
Plaintiff: iBeauty Brands, Inc.
Defendant: Bondi Boost US, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Hingle et al v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01489
Plaintiff: Heather Hingle and Cory Hingle
Defendant: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2675 Federal Tort Claims Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?