Real Property Cases filed in Ohio matching "S"
Cases 121 - 130 of 831,263
Morocho-Andilema v. Garland
as 24-1642
Petitioner: SAMUEL RAIMUADO MOROCHO-ANDILEMA, ESTEFANIA CECILIA BUNAY-TENEMAZA and LIAM JARED MOROCHO-BUNAY
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
USA v. Justin Law
as 24-2138
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JUSTIN LAW
Davis v. Dome
as 24-20284
Plaintiff: Monroe Lavard Davis
Defendant: Michael Dome, PA, Provider at Boyd Unit, Patrick S. Muldowney, PA, Provider at Boyd Unit and University of Texas Medical Board
Friederichsen v. BBVA Securities
as 24-20282
Plaintiff: Rafael Friederichsen
Defendant: BBVA Securities, Incorporated
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Plaintiff: Marques Tavron
Defendant: Dexter Payne, Director ADC, Moses Jackson, III, Head Warden, ADC, M. Richardson, Deputy Warden, ADC and others
Turrey, et al. v. Vervent, Inc., et al.
as 24-3849
Plaintiff: HEATHER TURREY, OLIVER FIATY, JORDAN HERNANDEZ and others
Defendant: VERVENT, INC., ACTIVATE FINANCIAL, LLC and DAVID JOHNSON
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv01505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Sims v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00190
Plaintiff: Wesley Robert Sims
Defendant: Keith Miller, Joshua Finkley and Michael Cunningham
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REED v. AINSLEY et al
as 2:2024cv00907
Plaintiff: S. JALIL REED
Defendant: C.O. AINSLEY, C.O. COOPER and SGT NAHLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Israel v. Tomlison et al
as 4:2024cv03718
Plaintiff: Akiva Israel
Defendant: S. Tomlison, C. Sanchez, Correctional Officer Soto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?