Cases 51 - 60 of 827,701
Wrice v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv02261
Petitioner:
Christopher John Wrice
Respondent:
Micheal Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02844
Plaintiff:
Laura Martinez and Jose Martinez
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Billingsley et al v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02841
Plaintiff:
Melvin Billingsley and Bethel Billingsley
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner v. Holden et al
as 1:2024cv02243
Plaintiff:
Debra Turner
Defendant:
Roger Holden and Barr-Nunn Transportation Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
George v. Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
as 3:2024cv08102
Plaintiff:
Rosita George
Defendant:
Office of Navajo and Hopi Indian Relocation
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640 Indian Tribal Rights
Mosley v. Dancy et al
as 4:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Terrell Mosley
Defendant:
Austin Dancy, Wellpath LLC, Laconya Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. King et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Defendant:
Josephus J King, Jackson, Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03094
Plaintiff:
J. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
S.K. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03109
Plaintiff:
S. K.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
