Cases 11 - 20 of 49
United Supreme Council, 33 Deg v. United Supreme Council
as 19-1942
Defendant / Appellee:
RALPH SLAUGHTER, UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL OF THE ANCIENT ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE FOR THE 33 DEGREE OF FREEMASONRY, PRINCE HALL AFFILIATED, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation, MICHAEL A. PARRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL, 33 DEGREE OF THE ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE OF FREEMASONRY, PRINCE HALL AFFILIATION, SOUTHERN JURISDICTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, a Tennessee Non-Profit Corporation and UNITED SUPREME COUNCIL 33 (THIRTY-THREE) OF THE ANCIENT AND ACCEPTED SCOTTISH RITE OF FREEMASONRY (PRINCE HALL AFFILIATION) SOUTHERN JURISDICTION U.S., GRAND ORIENT AT WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, a District of Columbia Non-Profit Corporation; T
Defendant:
ROGER C. BROWN, Individually and as Grand Master of the Most Worshipful Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Virginia Free and Accepted Masons, Incorporated and MOST WORSHIPFUL PRINCE HALL GRAND LODGE OF VIRGINIA FREE AND ACCEPTED MASONS, INCORPORATED
Mayor and City Council of Balt v. Alex Azar, II
as 19-1614
Defendant / Appellant:
OFFICE OF POPULATION AFFAIRS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, ALEX M. AZAR, II, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Health and Human Services and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY FOR ADOLESCENT HEALTH AND MEDICINE, UNION FOR REFORM JUDAISM, ALABAMA and others
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1468
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, STEPHEN PORTER, GARY BECKMAN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP, CHIMES D.C. INC. HEALTH & WELFARE PLAN, THE CHIMES DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, INCORPORATED and others
R. Acosta v. Benefits Consulting Group
as 19-1122
Defendant:
MARILYN WARD, CHIMES INTERNATIONAL, LTD., MARTIN LAMPNER and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
R. ALEXANDER ACOSTA, Secretary of Labor
Defendant / Appellee:
BENEFITS CONSULTING GROUP and JEFFREY RAMSEY
Phil Kerpen v. Metropolitan Washington
as 17-1735
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHIL KERPEN, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, AUSTIN RUSE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, CATHY RUSE, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
METROPOLITAN WASHINGTON AIRPORTS AUTHORITY, ANTHONY FOXX, in his official capacity as Secretary of Transportation and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Intervenor/Defendant:
KARL ANTHONY RACINE
Intervenor:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Intl Refugee Assistance v. Donald J. Trump
as 17-1351
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTERNATIONAL REFUGEE ASSISTANCE PROJECT, a project of the Urban Justice Center, Inc., on behalf of itself and its clients, HIAS, INC., on behalf of itself and its clients, MUHAMMED METEAB and others
Defendant / Appellant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United States, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, DEPARTMENT OF STATE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ARIZONA and others
Michael Gorbey v. OBAMA
as 17-6035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY, a/k/a Michael S. Owlfeather-Gorbey
Defendant - Appellee:
PRESIDENT BARACK H. OBAMA, United States President Washington D.C., UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Washington DC, LINDSEY GRAHAM, U.S. Senate South Carolina and others
Owaiian M. Jones v. FBI
as 15-7851
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, USA and DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Owaiian Jones v. Roanoke City Sheriff
as 15-7650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OWAIIAN M. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
ROANOKE CITY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, RAPPAHANNOCK REGIONAL JAIL STAFF, THE CITY OF ROANOKE, VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-2056
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
