Cases 61 - 70 of 461
David Webb v. Michael Kline
as 22-1922
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID WEBB
Defendant / Appellee:
MICHAEL KLINE, Mayor, HILARY A. CROTHERS-MOORE, Commissioner, CORPORAL DENNIS R. WOOD, Police Officer and others
Moore et al v. Nanz et al
as 5:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
Linwood Dajuan Moore and Brandon Michael Leach
Defendant:
Officer David Michael Nanz and Town of Mount Olive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Moore v. Moore
as 1:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
Javon Moore
Defendant:
Andrew Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01484
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
DRUMWRIGHT et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2020cv00998
Plaintiff:
Rev. GREGORY B. DRUMWRIGHT, Edith Ann Jones, MELANIE MITCHELL and others
Defendant:
SHERIFF TERRY S. JOHNSON, Chief Mary Kristy Cole, JONATHAN FRANKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Blackwell v. McFadden et al
as 3:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
Adrianna Esther Blackwell
Defendant:
Garry L. McFadden, Dwight D. Weller, Tiffany Parker Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Woodrow Moore, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 22-1433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WOODROW W. MOORE, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00243
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
