Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Clark v. Trammell et al
as 1:2021cv00495
Respondent:
Marcus Johnson, Michael L. Wade, John Marshall and others
Petitioner:
Daniel James Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reed v. Hudgins et al
as 5:2020cv00263
Petitioner:
Corey S. Reed
Respondent:
R. Hudgins, U.S. Marshalls and BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Mack v. Wilfredo
as 9:2020cv04227
Respondent:
Martell Wilfredo
Petitioner:
Mr Marshall Mack, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jennings v. FCI McDowell et al
as 1:2020cv00685
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jennings v. FCI McDowell et al
as 5:2020hc02192
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Beezy Bey
Respondent:
FCI McDowell and United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MARSHALL v. WELLS
as 1:2020cv00824
Respondent:
BRYAN K. WELLS
Petitioner:
RAYMOND C. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Simmons v. Al Cannon Detention Center et al
as 8:2020cv02897
Respondent:
US Marshal Service, Al Cannon Detention Center and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Vincent B Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Curtis v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 7:2020cv00414
Petitioner:
Clay Marshall Curtis
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Earquhart v. United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina et al
as 1:2020cv00620
Respondent:
United States Marshalls for the Eastern District North Carolina and Piedmont Regional Jail
Petitioner:
Xavier Milton Earquhart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jennings v. U.S. Homeland Security et al
as 2:2020cv00276
Petitioner:
Brandon Marquis Jennings and Mustafa Bey
Respondent:
U.S. Government, U.S. of America, U.S. Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
