Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Wilson v. USP Lee
as 5:2023ct03068
Plaintiff:
Andrew Scott Wilson
Defendant:
USP Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Owlfeather-Gorbey v. Williams
as 22-6875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
(CHIEF) COL. MICHAEL S. OWLFEATHER-GORBEY
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN JANE OR JOHN DOE, Director, IRS Department of the Treasury, WILLIAMS, Reck Officer, FCI Beckley, FORREN, Lieutenant, FCI Beckley and others
Crawford v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Shakeem Crawford
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Aguero Alvarado v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, The et al
as 0:2022cv01723
Plaintiff:
Fausto Alejandro Aguero Alvarado and Fausto Alejandro Aguero-Alverado
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, The, FCI Estill, SC, William E. Mackelburg and others
Petitioner:
Alan McCrory Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Dickson v. USP Hazelton
as 5:2022cv00025
Plaintiff:
Curtis Dickson
Defendant:
USP Hazelton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Thompson v. Coleman USP-1
as 5:2022cv00222
Plaintiff:
Brandon Jermel Thompson
Defendant:
Coleman USP-1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Meadows v. USP Yazoo
as 5:2021ct03076
Plaintiff:
Renaldo Keitron Meadows
Defendant:
USP Yazoo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACOBS v. USP MCCREARY et al
as 1:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Defendant:
USP MCCREARY and USP BIG SANDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JACOBS v. USP MCCREARY
as 1:2019cv01142
Plaintiff:
CORY LEE JACOBS
Defendant:
USP MCCREARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. BOP Director, The et al
as 1:2019cv02118
Plaintiff:
William Jones and William Lee Jones
Defendant:
Beaumont USP, Pollock USP, McCreary USP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
