Constitutionality of State Statutes Cases filed in the Fourth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Northern Virginia Hemp v. Commonwealth of VA
as 23-2192
Plaintiff / Appellant: NORTHERN VIRGINIA HEMP AND AGRICULTURE, LLC, ROSE LANE and FRANNY'S OPERATIONS, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, GLENN YOUNGKIN, Governor of the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity, JASON S. MIYARES, Attorney General for the Commonwealth of Virginia, in his official capacity and others
RISING EAGLE v. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00514
Plaintiff: RISING EAGLE and JOHNATHAN M. STUDIVENT
Defendant: THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE TROOPERS, NORTH CAROLINA GOVERNOR ROY COOPER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
South Carolina Freedom Caucus v. Jordan et al
as 3:2023cv00795
Plaintiff: South Carolina Freedom Caucus
Defendant: Wallace H. Jordan, Jr., J. David Weeks, Beth E. Bernstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. et al v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00025
Defendant: Michael D. Roberts, M.D. and Michael A. King
Plaintiff: Marietta Memorial Hospital, Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. and Marietta Healthcare Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bey et al v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2020cv00807
Plaintiff: Monique-Amayah Bey and Andre-King Bey
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc. et al v. King et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00639
Defendant: Michael A. King and Michael D. Roberts, M.D.
Plaintiff: Marietta Area Healthcare, Inc., Marietta Memorial Hospital and Marietta Healthcare Physicians, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
King Oak Enterprises, Inc. et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland
as 8:2016cv01270
Plaintiff: King Oak Enterprises, Inc. , Tommie Broadwater III and Lilliam P Broadwater
Defendant: Prince George's County, Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
General Synod v. Thom Tillis
as 14-2225
Plaintiff - Appellee: GENERAL SYNOD OF THE UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST, JOSEPH HOFFMAN, Reverend, NANCY ELLETT ALLISON, Reverend and others
Defendant: ROY COOPER, Attorney General of North Carolina, DREW REISINGER, Register of Deeds, WAYNE NIXON, Register of Deeds and others
Movant - Appellant: THOM TILLIS, Speaker of the NC House of Representatives and PHIL BERGER, President Pro Tempore of the NC Senate
General Synod of The United Church of Christ et al v. Cooper et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2014cv00213
Plaintiff: General Synod of The United Church of Christ , Joseph Hoffman , Nancy Ellett Allison and others
Defendant: Roy Cooper , Drew Reisinger , Wayne Nixon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Greenville County Republican P v. Greenville County Election Com We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2170
Plaintiff - Appellant: GREENVILLE COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, a/k/a Greenville County Republican Executive Committee and WILLIAM MITCHELL, a/k/a Billy Mitchell
Plaintiff: SOUTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, PATRICK B. HADDON, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party and BETTY S. POE, in her official capacity as the Chairman of the Greenville County Republican Party
Defendant - Appellee: GREENVILLE COUNTY ELECTION COMMISSION, GREENVILLE COUNTY BOARD OF REGISTRATION and BILLY WAY, JR., in his official capacity as the Chairman of the South Carolina State Election Commission
Defendant: STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, JOHN H. HUDGENS, III, in his official capacity as the Chairman of the South Carolina State Election Committee and CITY OF GREENVILLE MUNICIPAL ELECTION COMMISSION
Intervenor/Defendant - Appellee: WAYNE GRIFFIN, REGINALD GRIFFIN, BRETT A. BURSEY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?