Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Ashton v. Banks et al
as 2:2020cv00624
Defendant:
Chief Probation Officer, Sharonda Banks and Doug Williams
Plaintiff:
Hezron Ashton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWENS v. UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2020cv00630
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OFJUSTICE and UNITED STATES PROBATION DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff:
PHILLIP A. OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Keel v. Waccamaw Mental Health et al
as 4:2020cv00920
Plaintiff:
Molly Keel
Defendant:
Probate Judge Donna Lupo, Waccamaw Mental Health, Horry County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01045
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv01817
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
HAMBLEN v. LIST UNKNOWN TO SELF OF TRUSTEES et al
as 1:2018cv00174
Plaintiff:
DONNA HAMBLEN
Defendant:
LIST UNKNOWN TO SELF OF TRUSTEES, LIST UNKNOWN TO SELF OF PROBATE, LIST UNKNOWN TO SELF OF PROBATE/TRUST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Doe v. SC Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services et al
as 2:2017cv02829
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
SC Department of Probation Pardon and Parole Services and Craig Lee Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hamilton v. State of Maryland Parole and Probation Commission
as 1:2017cv00548
Plaintiff:
Charles K Hamilton
Defendant:
State of Maryland Parole and Probation Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
