Cases 31 - 40 of 117
Pruette v. Armstrong et al
as 6:2019cv00968
Plaintiff:
Todd Pruette
Defendant:
Maxim Healthcare Services Inc, Lisa Armstrong, Bair Foundation, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00952
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00556
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Armstrong v. Justus et al
as 1:2018cv01466
Defendant:
Ralph Justus, S.P. McKinney, E.W. Boothe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rice v. NC Department of Health and Human Services, et al
as 1:2018cv00142
Plaintiff:
Donald Lee Rice
Defendant:
Roy Cooper, Mandy Cohen, Dale Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
The West Virginia Business College, Incorporated et al v. Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools et al
as 5:2018cv00051
Plaintiff:
The West Virginia Business College, Incorporated and John A. Tarr, IV
Defendant:
Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools, West Virginia Council for Community and Technical College Education and Sarah Armstrong Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. State of Maryland et al
as 8:2018cv01011
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Armstrong
Defendant:
State of Maryland and Greenbelt Police Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Boyd et al v. Armstrong et al
as 1:2017cv02849
Plaintiff:
Martha Boyd and Deona Styron
Defendant:
Tyler Armstrong, Kenneth Burns, Michael Bowman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01935
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
