Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-1328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
PROCTOR v. HUGGINS et al
as 1:2014cv00238
Plaintiff:
SPENCER ALLAN PROCTOR
Defendant:
J. C. HUGGINS, KATY POOLE, ROBERT TRASK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2013cv26700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wallace v. Chapman et al
as 1:2013cv01330
Plaintiff:
Harry Lenzy Wallace
Defendant:
Michael Chapman, Ricky Frye, Jeffrey Ebersole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00544
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv03181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Heather Hoffman v. Sheriff P. J. Tanner
as 11-6567
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HEATHER C. HOFFMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
P. TANNER, Sheriff, MICHAEL HATFIELD, Chief Deputy, BRIAN BAIRD, Criminal Investigator and others
Defendant:
ISAAC MCDUFFIE STONE, III, Chief Deputy Solicitor, PHARMALA L. FREEMAN, SORONA JENKINS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2010cv00002
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Hoffman v. Tanner et al
as 9:2008cv00117
Plaintiff:
Heather C Hoffman
Defendant:
P J Tanner, Michael Hatfield, Brian Baird and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. Mason et al
as 3:2007cv00180
Plaintiff:
Tammantha Patrice Shaw
Defendant:
India H. Mason and Katie Murduck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
