Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Joseph Wood v. Jim Rubenstein
as 15-6014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH WILLIAM WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
JIM RUBENSTEIN, MARVIN C. PLUMLEY, THOMAS HARLAN, Capt. and others
Defendant:
NURSE, on Duty July 31, 2012 (P.M. Shift, Name unknown), TRISTEN TENNEY and WEXFORD MEDICAL SOURCES
PRENTICE V. BOGGS ET AL
as 1:2014cv01049
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. PRENTICE
Defendant:
LISA BLUE BOGGS and MICHAEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prentice v. Boggs et al
as 5:2014ct03285
Plaintiff:
Steven Prentice
Defendant:
Lisa Blue Boggs and Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Visser et al
as 5:2014ct03203
Plaintiff:
James Michael Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Celia Visser, Matt Lively, Gary E. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. Michael Harriot
as 14-6729
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL OWEN HARRIOT, a/k/a Lanky, a/k/a Donovan Smith, a/k/a Richard Onyett, a/k/a Bernard Barber, a/k/a James D. Smith, a/k/a Michael Smith
Smith v. Greenwood County Detention Center
as 1:2014cv01113
Plaintiff:
Wayne Michael Smith
Defendant:
Greenwood County Detention Center, Linda Middleton and Tony Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kalvin Smith v. Todd Pinion
as 13-7325
Petitioner - Appellant:
KALVIN MICHAEL SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
TODD PINION, Superintendent
Wood v. Rubenstein et al
as 5:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Joseph William Wood
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, Marvin C. Plumley, Thomas Harlan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-6899
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Party-in-Interest:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Smith v. Filbert et al
as 8:2010cv00653
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
William Filbert, Williams, Coii and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
